Ghana vs United Republic of Tanzania: Incidence of caloric losses at retail distribution level (percent)

Ghana
4.83 %
in 2025
United Republic of Tanzania
3.44 %
in 2025
Ghana rank
4th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
5th

Incidence of caloric losses at retail distribution level (percent) over time

  • Ghana
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0246200020122025

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 4.83 % against 3.44 % in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 1.39 %.

That makes Ghana's figure about 1.4 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Ghana has been ahead every year.

Ghana ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 187 countries.

Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 5.16 % 3.48 % 1.69 % Ghana
2010s 5.09 % 3.52 % 1.57 % Ghana
2020s 4.87 % 3.42 % 1.44 % Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher incidence of caloric losses at retail distribution level (percent), Ghana or United Republic of Tanzania?
Ghana, at 4.83 % against 3.44 % in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2025.
What is the difference in incidence of caloric losses at retail distribution level (percent) between Ghana and United Republic of Tanzania?
1.39 %, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and United Republic of Tanzania?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Ghana and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for incidence of caloric losses at retail distribution level (percent)?
Ghana ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 5th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Incidence of caloric losses at retail distribution level (percent) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ghana vs United Republic of Tanzania: Incidence of caloric losses at retail distribution level (percent). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/incidence-of-caloric-losses-at-retail-distribution-level-percent-value/ghana/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/incidence-of-caloric-losses-at-retail-distribution-level-percent-value/ghana/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Ghana vs United Republic of Tanzania: Incidence of caloric losses at retail distribution level (percent)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Incidence of caloric losses at retail distribution level (percent) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
203 places, 5,275 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.