Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Palestine: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employment in fishing and

Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.16 %
in 2024
Palestine
0.3 %
in 2022
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
64th
Palestine rank
61st

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employment in fishing and over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Palestine
00.511.5200020122024

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 0.3 % against 0.16 % in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.14 %.

That makes Palestine's figure about 1.9 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Palestine ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 64th and Palestine ranks 61st of 66 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Palestine in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Palestine Difference Ahead
2000s 0.3467 % 1.01 % 0.66 % Palestine
2010s 0.6 % 0.55 % 0.05 % Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 0.35 % 0.3833 % 0.0333 % Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — share of employment in fishing and, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Palestine?
Palestine, at 0.3 % against 0.16 % in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2022.
What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — share of employment in fishing and between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Palestine?
0.14 %, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Palestine?
8 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Palestine rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — share of employment in fishing and?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 64th and Palestine ranks 61st of 66 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employment in fishing and aquaculture — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Palestine: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employment in fishing and. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-share-of-employment-in-fishing-and-aquaculture-value/bosnia-and-herzegovina/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-share-of-employment-in-fishing-and-aquaculture-value/bosnia-and-herzegovina/west-bank-and-gaza/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Palestine: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employment in fishing and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employment in fishing and aquaculture — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
73 places, 1,102 data points, 1992–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.