Myanmar vs United States of America: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employees in agriculture in

Myanmar
27.06 %
in 2020
United States of America
0.73 %
in 2025
Myanmar rank
2nd
United States of America rank
2nd

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employees in agriculture in over time

  • Myanmar
  • United States of America
010203040197620002025

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 27.06 % against 0.73 % in United States of America, a difference of 26.33 %.

That makes Myanmar's figure about 37.1 times United States of America's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.

Myanmar ranks 2nd and United States of America ranks 2nd of 97 countries.

Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar United States of America Difference Ahead
2010s 33.15 % 0.69 % 32.46 % Myanmar
2020s 27.06 % 0.78 % 26.28 % Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — share of employees in agriculture in, Myanmar or United States of America?
Myanmar, at 27.06 % against 0.73 % in United States of America as of 2020.
What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — share of employees in agriculture in between Myanmar and United States of America?
26.33 %, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and United States of America?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
How do Myanmar and United States of America rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — share of employees in agriculture in?
Myanmar ranks 2nd and United States of America ranks 2nd of 97 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employees in agriculture in total employees — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Myanmar vs United States of America: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employees in agriculture in. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-share-of-employees-in-agriculture-in-total-employees-female/myanmar/united-states-of-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-share-of-employees-in-agriculture-in-total-employees-female/myanmar/united-states-of-america/">Myanmar vs United States of America: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employees in agriculture in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employees in agriculture in total employees — Female — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
106 places, 2,172 data points, 1976–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.