Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs Rwanda: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per

Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
30.35 No
in 2024
Rwanda
21.3 No
in 2024
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank
87th
Rwanda rank
89th

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per over time

  • Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
  • Rwanda
0102030199320082024

How they compare

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) currently reports 30.35 No against 21.3 No in Rwanda, a difference of 9.05 No.

That makes Netherlands (Kingdom of the)'s figure about 1.4 times Rwanda's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Netherlands (Kingdom of the) has been ahead every year.

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 87th and Rwanda ranks 89th of 89 countries.

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Rwanda Difference Ahead
2010s 31.26 No 21.96 No 9.3 No Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2020s 30.54 No 21.2 No 9.34 No Netherlands (Kingdom of the)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per, Netherlands (Kingdom of the) or Rwanda?
Netherlands (Kingdom of the), at 30.35 No against 21.3 No in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per between Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Rwanda?
9.05 No, with Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Rwanda?
8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
How do Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Rwanda rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per?
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 87th and Rwanda ranks 89th of 89 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per employee in agriculture — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs Rwanda: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-mean-weekly-hours-actually-worked-per-employee-in-agriculture/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-mean-weekly-hours-actually-worked-per-employee-in-agriculture/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/rwanda/">Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs Rwanda: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per employee in agriculture — Value
Unit
No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
99 places, 1,913 data points, 1976–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.