Chile vs Montenegro: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per over time
- Chile
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 41.07 No against 40.73 No in Chile, a difference of 0.34 No.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 36th and Montenegro ranks 34th of 89 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 42.61 No | 41.28 No | 1.32 No | Chile |
| 2020s | 41.91 No | 41.24 No | 0.674 No | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per, Chile or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 41.07 No against 40.73 No in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per between Chile and Montenegro?
- 0.34 No, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Montenegro?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Montenegro rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per?
- Chile ranks 36th and Montenegro ranks 34th of 89 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per employee in agriculture — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.