Costa Rica vs United States of America: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per

Costa Rica
46.95 No
in 2025
United States of America
35.38 No
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
4th
United States of America rank
1st

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per over time

  • Costa Rica
  • United States of America
01020304050200320142025

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 46.95 No against 35.38 No in United States of America, a difference of 11.57 No.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.3 times United States of America's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 4th and United States of America ranks 1st of 86 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica United States of America Difference Ahead
2010s 44.47 No 36.18 No 8.28 No Costa Rica
2020s 45.96 No 35.89 No 10.06 No Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per, Costa Rica or United States of America?
Costa Rica, at 46.95 No against 35.38 No in United States of America as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per between Costa Rica and United States of America?
11.57 No, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and United States of America?
15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
How do Costa Rica and United States of America rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per?
Costa Rica ranks 4th and United States of America ranks 1st of 86 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per employee in agriculture — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs United States of America: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-mean-weekly-hours-actually-worked-per-employee-in-agriculture-3/costa-rica/united-states-of-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-mean-weekly-hours-actually-worked-per-employee-in-agriculture-3/costa-rica/united-states-of-america/">Costa Rica vs United States of America: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per employee in agriculture — Female — Value
Unit
No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
96 places, 1,846 data points, 1976–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.