Mauritius vs Philippines: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per over time
- Mauritius
- Philippines
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 32.31 No against 29.75 No in Philippines, a difference of 2.56 No.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 82nd and Philippines ranks 84th of 91 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.96 No | 31.1 No | 1.86 No | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 30.23 No | 31.1 No | 0.8662 No | Philippines |
| 2020s | 34.86 No | 30.24 No | 4.62 No | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per, Mauritius or Philippines?
- Mauritius, at 32.31 No against 29.75 No in Philippines as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per between Mauritius and Philippines?
- 2.56 No, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Philippines?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and Philippines rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per?
- Mauritius ranks 82nd and Philippines ranks 84th of 91 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per employed person in agriculture — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.