Australia vs Belize: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per over time
- Australia
- Belize
How they compare
Australia currently reports 40.06 No against 40 No in Belize, a difference of 0.06 No.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Belize ahead.
Australia ranks 44th and Belize ranks 47th of 91 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Belize in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Belize | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 40.33 No | 42.65 No | 2.32 No | Belize |
| 2020s | 40.06 No | 40 No | 0.06 No | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per, Australia or Belize?
- Australia, at 40.06 No against 40 No in Belize as of 2020.
- What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per between Australia and Belize?
- 0.06 No, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Belize?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Belize rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per?
- Australia ranks 44th and Belize ranks 47th of 91 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per employed person in agriculture — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.