Brunei Darussalam vs New Zealand: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- New Zealand
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 28.55 No against 28 No in New Zealand, a difference of 0.55 No.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Brunei Darussalam has been ahead every year.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 75th and New Zealand ranks 76th of 88 countries.
Brunei Darussalam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 46.48 No | 27 No | 19.48 No | Brunei Darussalam |
| 2020s | 32.26 No | 28 No | 4.26 No | Brunei Darussalam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per, Brunei Darussalam or New Zealand?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 28.55 No against 28 No in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per between Brunei Darussalam and New Zealand?
- 0.55 No, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and New Zealand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and New Zealand rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — mean weekly hours actually worked per?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 75th and New Zealand ranks 76th of 88 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Mean weekly hours actually worked per employed person in agriculture — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.