Thailand vs United States of America: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal

Thailand
11,038 1000 No
in 2024
United States of America
1,721 1000 No
in 2025
Thailand rank
5th
United States of America rank
2nd

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal over time

  • Thailand
  • United States of America
05.0k10.0k15.0k200320142025

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 11,038 1000 No against 1,721 1000 No in United States of America, a difference of 9,317 1000 No.

That makes Thailand's figure about 6.4 times United States of America's.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.

Thailand ranks 5th and United States of America ranks 2nd of 78 countries.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Thailand United States of America Difference Ahead
2010s 12,226 1000 No 1,747 1000 No 10,479 1000 No Thailand
2020s 11,373 1000 No 1,754 1000 No 9,619 1000 No Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — employment in crop and animal, Thailand or United States of America?
Thailand, at 11,038 1000 No against 1,721 1000 No in United States of America as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — employment in crop and animal between Thailand and United States of America?
9,317 1000 No, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Thailand and United States of America?
13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do Thailand and United States of America rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — employment in crop and animal?
Thailand ranks 5th and United States of America ranks 2nd of 78 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Thailand vs United States of America: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-crop-and-animal-production-hunting-and-related/thailand/united-states-of-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-crop-and-animal-production-hunting-and-related/thailand/united-states-of-america/">Thailand vs United States of America: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
85 places, 1,589 data points, 1992–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.