Australia vs Dominican Republic: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal

Australia
302.55 1000 No
in 2024
Dominican Republic
349.03 1000 No
in 2024
Australia rank
36th
Dominican Republic rank
34th

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal over time

  • Australia
  • Dominican Republic
0100200300400500200020122024

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 349.03 1000 No against 302.55 1000 No in Australia, a difference of 46.48 1000 No.

That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.2 times Australia's.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Dominican Republic has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 36th and Dominican Republic ranks 34th of 78 countries.

Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Dominican Republic Difference Ahead
2010s 309.38 1000 No 403.57 1000 No 94.19 1000 No Dominican Republic
2020s 300.84 1000 No 356.38 1000 No 55.53 1000 No Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — employment in crop and animal, Australia or Dominican Republic?
Dominican Republic, at 349.03 1000 No against 302.55 1000 No in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — employment in crop and animal between Australia and Dominican Republic?
46.48 1000 No, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Dominican Republic?
7 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
How do Australia and Dominican Republic rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — employment in crop and animal?
Australia ranks 36th and Dominican Republic ranks 34th of 78 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Dominican Republic: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-crop-and-animal-production-hunting-and-related/australia/dominican-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-crop-and-animal-production-hunting-and-related/australia/dominican-republic/">Australia vs Dominican Republic: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
85 places, 1,589 data points, 1992–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.