North Macedonia vs Uruguay: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal

North Macedonia
22.42 1000 No
in 2024
Uruguay
27.26 1000 No
in 2024
North Macedonia rank
52nd
Uruguay rank
50th

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Uruguay
01020304050200020122024

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 27.26 1000 No against 22.42 1000 No in North Macedonia, a difference of 4.84 1000 No.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times North Macedonia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was North Macedonia ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 52nd and Uruguay ranks 50th of 76 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Uruguay Difference Ahead
2000s 41.59 1000 No 28.08 1000 No 13.51 1000 No North Macedonia
2010s 45.32 1000 No 29.14 1000 No 16.18 1000 No North Macedonia
2020s 25.75 1000 No 27.93 1000 No 2.18 1000 No Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — employment in crop and animal, North Macedonia or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 27.26 1000 No against 22.42 1000 No in North Macedonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — employment in crop and animal between North Macedonia and Uruguay?
4.84 1000 No, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Uruguay?
19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do North Macedonia and Uruguay rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — employment in crop and animal?
North Macedonia ranks 52nd and Uruguay ranks 50th of 76 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Macedonia vs Uruguay: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-crop-and-animal-production-hunting-and-related-3/north-macedonia/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-crop-and-animal-production-hunting-and-related-3/north-macedonia/uruguay/">North Macedonia vs Uruguay: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities — Female — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
83 places, 1,556 data points, 1992–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.