Dominican Republic vs Lithuania: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal

Dominican Republic
22.36 1000 No
in 2024
Lithuania
24.13 1000 No
in 2024
Dominican Republic rank
53rd
Lithuania rank
51st

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Lithuania
255075100125199820112024

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 24.13 1000 No against 22.36 1000 No in Dominican Republic, a difference of 1.77 1000 No.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Dominican Republic's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lithuania ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 53rd and Lithuania ranks 51st of 76 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 22.54 1000 No 80.75 1000 No 58.2 1000 No Lithuania
2010s 25.48 1000 No 37.43 1000 No 11.95 1000 No Lithuania
2020s 25.69 1000 No 23.24 1000 No 2.45 1000 No Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — employment in crop and animal, Dominican Republic or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 24.13 1000 No against 22.36 1000 No in Dominican Republic as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — employment in crop and animal between Dominican Republic and Lithuania?
1.77 1000 No, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Lithuania?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Dominican Republic and Lithuania rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — employment in crop and animal?
Dominican Republic ranks 53rd and Lithuania ranks 51st of 76 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Lithuania: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-crop-and-animal-production-hunting-and-related-3/dominican-republic/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-crop-and-animal-production-hunting-and-related-3/dominican-republic/lithuania/">Dominican Republic vs Lithuania: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities — Female — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
83 places, 1,556 data points, 1992–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.