Argentina vs Dominican Republic: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal

Argentina
17.08 1000 No
in 2024
Dominican Republic
22.36 1000 No
in 2024
Argentina rank
56th
Dominican Republic rank
53rd

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal over time

  • Argentina
  • Dominican Republic
10203040200020122024

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 22.36 1000 No against 17.08 1000 No in Argentina, a difference of 5.28 1000 No.

That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.3 times Argentina's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Dominican Republic has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 56th and Dominican Republic ranks 53rd of 76 countries.

Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Dominican Republic Difference Ahead
2010s 10.58 1000 No 26.45 1000 No 15.87 1000 No Dominican Republic
2020s 15.14 1000 No 25.69 1000 No 10.55 1000 No Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — employment in crop and animal, Argentina or Dominican Republic?
Dominican Republic, at 22.36 1000 No against 17.08 1000 No in Argentina as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — employment in crop and animal between Argentina and Dominican Republic?
5.28 1000 No, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Dominican Republic?
12 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
How do Argentina and Dominican Republic rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — employment in crop and animal?
Argentina ranks 56th and Dominican Republic ranks 53rd of 76 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Dominican Republic: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-crop-and-animal-production-hunting-and-related-3/argentina/dominican-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-crop-and-animal-production-hunting-and-related-3/argentina/dominican-republic/">Argentina vs Dominican Republic: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities — Female — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
83 places, 1,556 data points, 1992–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.