Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Myanmar: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in agriculture by status

Iran (Islamic Republic of)
2,508 1000 No
in 2024
Myanmar
8,013 1000 No
in 2020
Iran (Islamic Republic of) rank
4th
Myanmar rank
6th

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in agriculture by status over time

  • Iran (Islamic Republic of)
  • Myanmar
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k200520142024

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 8,013 1000 No against 2,508 1000 No in Iran (Islamic Republic of), a difference of 5,505 1000 No.

That makes Myanmar's figure about 3.2 times Iran (Islamic Republic of)'s.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.

Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 4th and Myanmar ranks 6th of 7 countries.

Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iran (Islamic Republic of) Myanmar Difference Ahead
2010s 3,091 1000 No 8,705 1000 No 5,614 1000 No Myanmar
2020s 2,963 1000 No 8,013 1000 No 5,050 1000 No Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — employment in agriculture by status, Iran (Islamic Republic of) or Myanmar?
Myanmar, at 8,013 1000 No against 2,508 1000 No in Iran (Islamic Republic of) as of 2020.
What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — employment in agriculture by status between Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Myanmar?
5,505 1000 No, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Myanmar?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
How do Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Myanmar rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — employment in agriculture by status?
Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 4th and Myanmar ranks 6th of 7 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in agriculture by status of employment, self-employed — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Myanmar: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in agriculture by status. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-agriculture-by-status-of-employment-self/iran-islamic-republic-of/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-agriculture-by-status-of-employment-self/iran-islamic-republic-of/myanmar/">Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Myanmar: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in agriculture by status</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in agriculture by status of employment, self-employed — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 1,846 data points, 1976–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.