Ecuador vs Republic of Korea: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in agriculture by status

Ecuador
849.8 1000 No
in 2025
Republic of Korea
491.01 1000 No
in 2025
Ecuador rank
12th
Republic of Korea rank
15th

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in agriculture by status over time

  • Ecuador
  • Republic of Korea
02505007501.0k200020122025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 849.8 1000 No against 491.01 1000 No in Republic of Korea, a difference of 358.79 1000 No.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.7 times Republic of Korea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Republic of Korea ahead.

Ecuador ranks 12th and Republic of Korea ranks 15th of 86 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Republic of Korea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Republic of Korea Difference Ahead
2000s 447.72 1000 No 763.56 1000 No 315.85 1000 No Republic of Korea
2010s 549.81 1000 No 521.25 1000 No 28.56 1000 No Ecuador
2020s 845.77 1000 No 528.05 1000 No 317.72 1000 No Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — employment in agriculture by status, Ecuador or Republic of Korea?
Ecuador, at 849.8 1000 No against 491.01 1000 No in Republic of Korea as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — employment in agriculture by status between Ecuador and Republic of Korea?
358.79 1000 No, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Republic of Korea?
24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and Republic of Korea rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — employment in agriculture by status?
Ecuador ranks 12th and Republic of Korea ranks 15th of 86 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in agriculture by status of employment, self-employed — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Republic of Korea: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in agriculture by status. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-agriculture-by-status-of-employment-self-3/ecuador/republic-of-korea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-agriculture-by-status-of-employment-self-3/ecuador/republic-of-korea/">Ecuador vs Republic of Korea: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in agriculture by status</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in agriculture by status of employment, self-employed — Female — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
95 places, 1,827 data points, 1976–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.