Mexico vs United States of America: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in agriculture by status

Mexico
3,282 1000 No
in 2024
United States of America
1,782 1000 No
in 2025
Mexico rank
4th
United States of America rank
1st

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in agriculture by status over time

  • Mexico
  • United States of America
01.0k2.0k3.0k200220132025

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 3,282 1000 No against 1,782 1000 No in United States of America, a difference of 1,500 1000 No.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.8 times United States of America's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.

Mexico ranks 4th and United States of America ranks 1st of 88 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico United States of America Difference Ahead
2000s 2,303 1000 No 1,451 1000 No 852.38 1000 No Mexico
2010s 2,892 1000 No 1,717 1000 No 1,175 1000 No Mexico
2020s 3,234 1000 No 1,797 1000 No 1,438 1000 No Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — employment in agriculture by status, Mexico or United States of America?
Mexico, at 3,282 1000 No against 1,782 1000 No in United States of America as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — employment in agriculture by status between Mexico and United States of America?
1,500 1000 No, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and United States of America?
22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
How do Mexico and United States of America rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — employment in agriculture by status?
Mexico ranks 4th and United States of America ranks 1st of 88 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in agriculture by status of employment, employees — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs United States of America: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in agriculture by status. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-agriculture-by-status-of-employment-employees/mexico/united-states-of-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-agriculture-by-status-of-employment-employees/mexico/united-states-of-america/">Mexico vs United States of America: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in agriculture by status</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in agriculture by status of employment, employees — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
97 places, 1,846 data points, 1976–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.