Sao Tome and Principe vs Tunisia: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Sao Tome and Principe
9,103 USD
in 2024
Tunisia
9,644 USD
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe rank
77th
Tunisia rank
75th

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Tunisia
4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k12.0k199120072024

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 9,644 USD against 9,103 USD in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 541 USD.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 77th and Tunisia ranks 75th of 168 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Tunisia Difference Ahead
1990s 5,974 USD 4,422 USD 1,553 USD Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 8,098 USD 5,411 USD 2,687 USD Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 11,128 USD 7,646 USD 3,482 USD Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 10,100 USD 9,856 USD 244.67 USD Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Sao Tome and Principe or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 9,644 USD against 9,103 USD in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Sao Tome and Principe and Tunisia?
541 USD, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Tunisia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Tunisia rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 77th and Tunisia ranks 75th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Tunisia: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/sao-tome-and-principe/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/sao-tome-and-principe/tunisia/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Tunisia: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.