Republic of Moldova vs Timor-Leste: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Republic of Moldova
841.2 USD
in 2024
Timor-Leste
1,190 USD
in 2024
Republic of Moldova rank
10th
Timor-Leste rank
8th

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Republic of Moldova
  • Timor-Leste
5001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k199120072024

How they compare

Timor-Leste currently reports 1,190 USD against 841.2 USD in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 348.8 USD.

That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 1.4 times Republic of Moldova's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.

Republic of Moldova ranks 10th and Timor-Leste ranks 8th of 12 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Republic of Moldova averaged higher in 1 and Timor-Leste in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Republic of Moldova Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
1990s 1,434 USD 1,263 USD 170.88 USD Republic of Moldova
2000s 1,001 USD 1,385 USD 384.2 USD Timor-Leste
2010s 1,016 USD 1,353 USD 337.92 USD Timor-Leste
2020s 1,008 USD 1,244 USD 235.5 USD Timor-Leste

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Republic of Moldova or Timor-Leste?
Timor-Leste, at 1,190 USD against 841.2 USD in Republic of Moldova as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Republic of Moldova and Timor-Leste?
348.8 USD, with Timor-Leste ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Timor-Leste?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Republic of Moldova and Timor-Leste rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Republic of Moldova ranks 10th and Timor-Leste ranks 8th of 12 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Moldova vs Timor-Leste: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/republic-of-moldova/timor-leste-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/republic-of-moldova/timor-leste-2/">Republic of Moldova vs Timor-Leste: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.