Republic of Korea vs Suriname: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Republic of Korea
18,177 USD
in 2024
Suriname
16,640 USD
in 2024
Republic of Korea rank
50th
Suriname rank
53rd

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Republic of Korea
  • Suriname
020.0k40.0k60.0k199120072024

How they compare

Republic of Korea currently reports 18,177 USD against 16,640 USD in Suriname, a difference of 1,537 USD.

That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Suriname ahead.

Republic of Korea ranks 50th and Suriname ranks 53rd of 168 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Republic of Korea Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 9,228 USD 45,777 USD 36,549 USD Suriname
2000s 13,577 USD 24,989 USD 11,413 USD Suriname
2010s 20,073 USD 30,017 USD 9,943 USD Suriname
2020s 17,973 USD 18,178 USD 205.28 USD Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Republic of Korea or Suriname?
Republic of Korea, at 18,177 USD against 16,640 USD in Suriname as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Republic of Korea and Suriname?
1,537 USD, with Republic of Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Suriname?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Republic of Korea and Suriname rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Republic of Korea ranks 50th and Suriname ranks 53rd of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Korea vs Suriname: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/republic-of-korea/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/republic-of-korea/suriname/">Republic of Korea vs Suriname: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.