Morocco vs Namibia: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Morocco
4,349 USD
in 2024
Namibia
4,003 USD
in 2024
Morocco rank
102nd
Namibia rank
105th

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Morocco
  • Namibia
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199120072024

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 4,349 USD against 4,003 USD in Namibia, a difference of 346 USD.

That makes Morocco's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Namibia ahead.

Morocco ranks 102nd and Namibia ranks 105th of 168 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Morocco Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 1,673 USD 4,351 USD 2,678 USD Namibia
2000s 1,874 USD 6,319 USD 4,446 USD Namibia
2010s 3,204 USD 4,737 USD 1,532 USD Namibia
2020s 4,439 USD 4,398 USD 40.19 USD Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Morocco or Namibia?
Morocco, at 4,349 USD against 4,003 USD in Namibia as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Morocco and Namibia?
346 USD, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Namibia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Morocco and Namibia rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Morocco ranks 102nd and Namibia ranks 105th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) β€” Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) β€” Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Morocco vs Namibia: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/morocco/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/morocco/namibia/">Morocco vs Namibia: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) β€” Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) β€” Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.