Mongolia vs Namibia: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Mongolia
3,814 USD
in 2024
Namibia
4,003 USD
in 2024
Mongolia rank
112th
Namibia rank
109th

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Mongolia
  • Namibia
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199120072024

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 4,003 USD against 3,814 USD in Mongolia, a difference of 189 USD.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Namibia ahead.

Mongolia ranks 112th and Namibia ranks 109th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 2,119 USD 4,351 USD 2,232 USD Namibia
2000s 1,656 USD 6,319 USD 4,663 USD Namibia
2010s 3,415 USD 4,737 USD 1,322 USD Namibia
2020s 5,001 USD 4,398 USD 602.82 USD Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Mongolia or Namibia?
Namibia, at 4,003 USD against 3,814 USD in Mongolia as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Mongolia and Namibia?
189 USD, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Namibia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Mongolia and Namibia rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Mongolia ranks 112th and Namibia ranks 109th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) β€” Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) β€” Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Namibia: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/mongolia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/mongolia/namibia/">Mongolia vs Namibia: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) β€” Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) β€” Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.