Mauritius vs Russian Federation: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Mauritius
17,877 USD
in 2024
Russian Federation
15,862 USD
in 2024
Mauritius rank
52nd
Russian Federation rank
55th

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Mauritius
  • Russian Federation
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k199120072024

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 17,877 USD against 15,862 USD in Russian Federation, a difference of 2,015 USD.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Russian Federation's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Mauritius ranks 52nd and Russian Federation ranks 55th of 168 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 3,296 USD 4,454 USD 1,158 USD Russian Federation
2000s 5,456 USD 6,959 USD 1,503 USD Russian Federation
2010s 9,485 USD 10,781 USD 1,297 USD Russian Federation
2020s 15,279 USD 14,698 USD 581.52 USD Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Mauritius or Russian Federation?
Mauritius, at 17,877 USD against 15,862 USD in Russian Federation as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Mauritius and Russian Federation?
2,015 USD, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Russian Federation?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do Mauritius and Russian Federation rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Mauritius ranks 52nd and Russian Federation ranks 55th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Russian Federation: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/mauritius/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/mauritius/russian-federation-2/">Mauritius vs Russian Federation: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.