Malta vs United Republic of Tanzania: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Malta
91,508 USD
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
911.67 USD
in 2024
Malta rank
6th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
9th

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Malta
  • United Republic of Tanzania
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k199120072024

How they compare

Malta currently reports 91,508 USD against 911.67 USD in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 90,596 USD.

That makes Malta's figure about 100.4 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th of 168 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 25,520 USD 565.92 USD 24,954 USD Malta
2000s 39,715 USD 646.33 USD 39,069 USD Malta
2010s 42,961 USD 810.66 USD 42,150 USD Malta
2020s 63,335 USD 897.84 USD 62,437 USD Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Malta or United Republic of Tanzania?
Malta, at 91,508 USD against 911.67 USD in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Malta and United Republic of Tanzania?
90,596 USD, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and United Republic of Tanzania?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Malta and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Malta ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs United Republic of Tanzania: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/malta/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/malta/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Malta vs United Republic of Tanzania: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.