Malawi vs Zimbabwe: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Malawi
529.18 USD
in 2024
Zimbabwe
653.95 USD
in 2024
Malawi rank
162nd
Zimbabwe rank
159th

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Malawi
  • Zimbabwe
2004006008001.0k199120072024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 653.95 USD against 529.18 USD in Malawi, a difference of 124.77 USD.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Malawi ranks 162nd and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 168 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 303.67 USD 959.91 USD 656.24 USD Zimbabwe
2000s 357.56 USD 609.06 USD 251.5 USD Zimbabwe
2010s 507.35 USD 510.19 USD 2.84 USD Zimbabwe
2020s 546.48 USD 731.96 USD 185.49 USD Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Malawi or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 653.95 USD against 529.18 USD in Malawi as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Malawi and Zimbabwe?
124.77 USD, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Malawi and Zimbabwe rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Malawi ranks 162nd and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Zimbabwe: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/malawi/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/malawi/zimbabwe/">Malawi vs Zimbabwe: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.