Latvia vs Turkmenistan: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time
- Latvia
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 14,030 USD against 13,788 USD in Turkmenistan, a difference of 242 USD.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 62nd and Turkmenistan ranks 64th of 168 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Turkmenistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,267 USD | 4,327 USD | 1,060 USD | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 6,423 USD | 5,199 USD | 1,224 USD | Latvia |
| 2010s | 13,001 USD | 7,316 USD | 5,685 USD | Latvia |
| 2020s | 16,711 USD | 13,003 USD | 3,708 USD | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Latvia or Turkmenistan?
- Latvia, at 14,030 USD against 13,788 USD in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Latvia and Turkmenistan?
- 242 USD, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Turkmenistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Turkmenistan rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
- Latvia ranks 62nd and Turkmenistan ranks 64th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.