Indonesia vs Trinidad and Tobago: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Indonesia
3,698 USD
in 2024
Trinidad and Tobago
3,531 USD
in 2024
Indonesia rank
110th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
112th

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Indonesia
  • Trinidad and Tobago
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k199120072024

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 3,698 USD against 3,531 USD in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 167 USD.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Indonesia ranks 110th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 112th of 168 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 1,626 USD 8,679 USD 7,053 USD Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 1,833 USD 8,716 USD 6,884 USD Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 2,857 USD 6,061 USD 3,204 USD Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 3,630 USD 4,208 USD 578.28 USD Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Indonesia or Trinidad and Tobago?
Indonesia, at 3,698 USD against 3,531 USD in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Indonesia and Trinidad and Tobago?
167 USD, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Trinidad and Tobago?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Indonesia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Indonesia ranks 110th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 112th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Trinidad and Tobago: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/indonesia/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/indonesia/trinidad-and-tobago/">Indonesia vs Trinidad and Tobago: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.