Guatemala vs Papua New Guinea: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Guatemala
3,471 USD
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
3,589 USD
in 2024
Guatemala rank
113th
Papua New Guinea rank
111th

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Guatemala
  • Papua New Guinea
2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k6.0k7.0k199120072024

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 3,589 USD against 3,471 USD in Guatemala, a difference of 118 USD.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Guatemala ranks 113th and Papua New Guinea ranks 111th of 168 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 2,608 USD 6,632 USD 4,025 USD Papua New Guinea
2000s 2,755 USD 5,788 USD 3,033 USD Papua New Guinea
2010s 3,184 USD 4,914 USD 1,730 USD Papua New Guinea
2020s 3,520 USD 3,571 USD 50.51 USD Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Guatemala or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 3,589 USD against 3,471 USD in Guatemala as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Guatemala and Papua New Guinea?
118 USD, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Papua New Guinea?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Guatemala and Papua New Guinea rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Guatemala ranks 113th and Papua New Guinea ranks 111th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Papua New Guinea: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/guatemala/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/guatemala/papua-new-guinea/">Guatemala vs Papua New Guinea: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.