French Polynesia vs Iceland: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

French Polynesia
88,729 USD
in 2024
Iceland
128,536 USD
in 2024
French Polynesia rank
7th
Iceland rank
5th

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Iceland
050.0k100.0k150.0k199120072024

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 128,536 USD against 88,729 USD in French Polynesia, a difference of 39,807 USD.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.4 times French Polynesia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was French Polynesia ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 7th and Iceland ranks 5th of 168 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Iceland Difference Ahead
1990s 107,612 USD 72,683 USD 34,929 USD French Polynesia
2000s 61,871 USD 85,755 USD 23,884 USD Iceland
2010s 64,525 USD 106,922 USD 42,397 USD Iceland
2020s 80,733 USD 128,410 USD 47,677 USD Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), French Polynesia or Iceland?
Iceland, at 128,536 USD against 88,729 USD in French Polynesia as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between French Polynesia and Iceland?
39,807 USD, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Iceland?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do French Polynesia and Iceland rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
French Polynesia ranks 7th and Iceland ranks 5th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Iceland: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/french-polynesia/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/french-polynesia/iceland/">French Polynesia vs Iceland: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.