Finland vs New Zealand: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Finland
56,967 USD
in 2024
New Zealand
56,538 USD
in 2024
Finland rank
16th
New Zealand rank
17th

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Finland
  • New Zealand
20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k60.0k199120072024

How they compare

Finland currently reports 56,967 USD against 56,538 USD in New Zealand, a difference of 429 USD.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was New Zealand ahead.

Finland ranks 16th and New Zealand ranks 17th of 168 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 23,437 USD 36,408 USD 12,971 USD New Zealand
2000s 34,391 USD 44,313 USD 9,922 USD New Zealand
2010s 47,638 USD 49,628 USD 1,990 USD New Zealand
2020s 54,140 USD 51,009 USD 3,131 USD Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Finland or New Zealand?
Finland, at 56,967 USD against 56,538 USD in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Finland and New Zealand?
429 USD, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and New Zealand?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Finland and New Zealand rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Finland ranks 16th and New Zealand ranks 17th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs New Zealand: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/finland/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/finland/new-zealand/">Finland vs New Zealand: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.