Eswatini vs Sao Tome and Principe: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Eswatini
9,007 USD
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
9,103 USD
in 2024
Eswatini rank
78th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
77th

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Sao Tome and Principe
4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k12.0k199120072024

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 9,103 USD against 9,007 USD in Eswatini, a difference of 96 USD.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 78th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 77th of 168 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 5,630 USD 5,974 USD 344.65 USD Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 8,210 USD 8,098 USD 112.22 USD Eswatini
2010s 9,491 USD 11,128 USD 1,637 USD Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 9,348 USD 10,100 USD 752.56 USD Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Eswatini or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 9,103 USD against 9,007 USD in Eswatini as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe?
96 USD, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Eswatini ranks 78th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 77th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Sao Tome and Principe: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/eswatini/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/eswatini/sao-tome-and-principe/">Eswatini vs Sao Tome and Principe: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.