Equatorial Guinea vs Uganda: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Equatorial Guinea
725.24 USD
in 2024
Uganda
676.16 USD
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
155th
Uganda rank
158th

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Uganda
05001.0k1.5k199120072024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 725.24 USD against 676.16 USD in Uganda, a difference of 49.08 USD.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 155th and Uganda ranks 158th of 168 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Uganda Difference Ahead
1990s 1,091 USD 796.36 USD 295.12 USD Equatorial Guinea
2000s 925.95 USD 886.56 USD 39.39 USD Equatorial Guinea
2010s 805.05 USD 703.01 USD 102.04 USD Equatorial Guinea
2020s 720.66 USD 668.92 USD 51.73 USD Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Equatorial Guinea or Uganda?
Equatorial Guinea, at 725.24 USD against 676.16 USD in Uganda as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Equatorial Guinea and Uganda?
49.08 USD, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Uganda?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Uganda rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 155th and Uganda ranks 158th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Uganda: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/equatorial-guinea/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/equatorial-guinea/uganda/">Equatorial Guinea vs Uganda: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.