Congo, Republic of vs Niger: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Congo, Republic of
1,297 USD
in 2024
Niger
816.06 USD
in 2024
Congo, Republic of rank
151st
Niger rank
154th

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Congo, Republic of
  • Niger
2505007501.0k1.2k1.5k199120072024

How they compare

Congo, Republic of currently reports 1,297 USD against 816.06 USD in Niger, a difference of 480.94 USD.

That makes Congo, Republic of's figure about 1.6 times Niger's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Congo, Republic of has been ahead every year.

Congo, Republic of ranks 151st and Niger ranks 154th of 168 countries.

Congo, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Republic of Niger Difference Ahead
1990s 1,162 USD 391.15 USD 770.6 USD Congo, Republic of
2000s 1,108 USD 447.16 USD 661.24 USD Congo, Republic of
2010s 1,298 USD 590.98 USD 706.98 USD Congo, Republic of
2020s 1,311 USD 725.41 USD 585.46 USD Congo, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Congo, Republic of or Niger?
Congo, Republic of, at 1,297 USD against 816.06 USD in Niger as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Congo, Republic of and Niger?
480.94 USD, with Congo, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Republic of and Niger?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Congo, Republic of and Niger rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Congo, Republic of ranks 151st and Niger ranks 154th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Republic of vs Niger: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/congo-rep/niger/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/congo-rep/niger/">Congo, Republic of vs Niger: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.