Congo vs Guinea-Bissau: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Congo
1,297 USD
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau
1,309 USD
in 2024
Congo rank
151st
Guinea-Bissau rank
150th

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Congo
  • Guinea-Bissau
05001.0k1.5k199120072024

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 1,309 USD against 1,297 USD in Congo, a difference of 12 USD.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 151st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 150th of 168 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Guinea-Bissau in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 1,162 USD 1,297 USD 135.53 USD Guinea-Bissau
2000s 1,108 USD 1,228 USD 119.68 USD Guinea-Bissau
2010s 1,298 USD 1,223 USD 74.61 USD Congo
2020s 1,311 USD 1,228 USD 82.7 USD Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Congo or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 1,309 USD against 1,297 USD in Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Congo and Guinea-Bissau?
12 USD, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Guinea-Bissau?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Congo and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Congo ranks 151st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 150th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Guinea-Bissau: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/congo-rep/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/congo-rep/guinea-bissau/">Congo vs Guinea-Bissau: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.