China, mainland vs Colombia: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

China, mainland
8,411 USD
in 2024
Colombia
6,702 USD
in 2024
China, mainland rank
82nd
Colombia rank
85th

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • China, mainland
  • Colombia
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199120072024

How they compare

China, mainland currently reports 8,411 USD against 6,702 USD in Colombia, a difference of 1,709 USD.

That makes China, mainland's figure about 1.3 times Colombia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Colombia ahead.

China, mainland ranks 82nd and Colombia ranks 85th of 168 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China, mainland averaged higher in 1 and Colombia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, mainland Colombia Difference Ahead
1990s 1,246 USD 4,199 USD 2,953 USD Colombia
2000s 1,944 USD 4,345 USD 2,402 USD Colombia
2010s 4,326 USD 5,026 USD 700.37 USD Colombia
2020s 7,442 USD 6,287 USD 1,154 USD China, mainland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), China, mainland or Colombia?
China, mainland, at 8,411 USD against 6,702 USD in Colombia as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between China, mainland and Colombia?
1,709 USD, with China, mainland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, mainland and Colombia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do China, mainland and Colombia rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
China, mainland ranks 82nd and Colombia ranks 85th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, mainland vs Colombia: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/china-mainland/colombia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/china-mainland/colombia/">China, mainland vs Colombia: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.