Canada vs French Polynesia: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Canada
132,599 USD
in 2024
French Polynesia
88,729 USD
in 2024
Canada rank
4th
French Polynesia rank
7th

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Canada
  • French Polynesia
40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k120.0k140.0k199120072024

How they compare

Canada currently reports 132,599 USD against 88,729 USD in French Polynesia, a difference of 43,870 USD.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.5 times French Polynesia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was French Polynesia ahead.

Canada ranks 4th and French Polynesia ranks 7th of 168 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 3 and French Polynesia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada French Polynesia Difference Ahead
1990s 43,565 USD 107,612 USD 64,047 USD French Polynesia
2000s 68,801 USD 61,871 USD 6,930 USD Canada
2010s 91,575 USD 64,525 USD 27,050 USD Canada
2020s 115,077 USD 80,733 USD 34,344 USD Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Canada or French Polynesia?
Canada, at 132,599 USD against 88,729 USD in French Polynesia as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Canada and French Polynesia?
43,870 USD, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and French Polynesia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Canada and French Polynesia rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Canada ranks 4th and French Polynesia ranks 7th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs French Polynesia: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/canada/french-polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/canada/french-polynesia/">Canada vs French Polynesia: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.