Cabo Verde vs Syrian Arab Republic: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Cabo Verde
4,359 USD
in 2024
Syrian Arab Republic
5,573 USD
in 2024
Cabo Verde rank
2nd
Syrian Arab Republic rank
3rd

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Cabo Verde
  • Syrian Arab Republic
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k199120072024

How they compare

Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 5,573 USD against 4,359 USD in Cabo Verde, a difference of 1,214 USD.

That makes Syrian Arab Republic's figure about 1.3 times Cabo Verde's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Syrian Arab Republic has been ahead every year.

Cabo Verde ranks 2nd and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 3rd of 3 countries.

Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cabo Verde Syrian Arab Republic Difference Ahead
1990s 2,665 USD 10,341 USD 7,676 USD Syrian Arab Republic
2000s 3,250 USD 13,986 USD 10,735 USD Syrian Arab Republic
2010s 3,931 USD 13,934 USD 10,004 USD Syrian Arab Republic
2020s 4,556 USD 6,835 USD 2,279 USD Syrian Arab Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Cabo Verde or Syrian Arab Republic?
Syrian Arab Republic, at 5,573 USD against 4,359 USD in Cabo Verde as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Cabo Verde and Syrian Arab Republic?
1,214 USD, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Syrian Arab Republic?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Cabo Verde and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Cabo Verde ranks 2nd and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 3rd of 3 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cabo Verde vs Syrian Arab Republic: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/cabo-verde-2/syrian-arab-republic-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/cabo-verde-2/syrian-arab-republic-2/">Cabo Verde vs Syrian Arab Republic: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.