Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Burkina Faso
682.68 USD
in 2024
Zimbabwe
653.95 USD
in 2024
Burkina Faso rank
157th
Zimbabwe rank
159th

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Zimbabwe
2004006008001.0k199120072024

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 682.68 USD against 653.95 USD in Zimbabwe, a difference of 28.73 USD.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 157th and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 168 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 367.87 USD 959.91 USD 592.04 USD Zimbabwe
2000s 471.42 USD 609.06 USD 137.64 USD Zimbabwe
2010s 610.55 USD 510.19 USD 100.36 USD Burkina Faso
2020s 636.57 USD 731.96 USD 95.39 USD Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Burkina Faso or Zimbabwe?
Burkina Faso, at 682.68 USD against 653.95 USD in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
28.73 USD, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Burkina Faso ranks 157th and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/burkina-faso/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/burkina-faso/zimbabwe/">Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.