Burkina Faso vs Equatorial Guinea: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Burkina Faso
682.68 USD
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea
725.24 USD
in 2024
Burkina Faso rank
157th
Equatorial Guinea rank
155th

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Equatorial Guinea
2505007501.0k1.2k199120072024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 725.24 USD against 682.68 USD in Burkina Faso, a difference of 42.56 USD.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Burkina Faso's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Burkina Faso ranks 157th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 155th of 168 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 367.87 USD 1,091 USD 723.62 USD Equatorial Guinea
2000s 471.42 USD 925.95 USD 454.53 USD Equatorial Guinea
2010s 610.55 USD 805.05 USD 194.5 USD Equatorial Guinea
2020s 636.57 USD 720.66 USD 84.09 USD Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Burkina Faso or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 725.24 USD against 682.68 USD in Burkina Faso as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Burkina Faso and Equatorial Guinea?
42.56 USD, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Equatorial Guinea?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Burkina Faso and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Burkina Faso ranks 157th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 155th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Equatorial Guinea: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/burkina-faso/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/burkina-faso/equatorial-guinea/">Burkina Faso vs Equatorial Guinea: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.