Brunei Darussalam vs New Zealand: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Brunei Darussalam
58,062 USD
in 2024
New Zealand
56,538 USD
in 2024
Brunei Darussalam rank
15th
New Zealand rank
17th

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Brunei Darussalam
  • New Zealand
020.0k40.0k60.0k199120072024

How they compare

Brunei Darussalam currently reports 58,062 USD against 56,538 USD in New Zealand, a difference of 1,524 USD.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was New Zealand ahead.

Brunei Darussalam ranks 15th and New Zealand ranks 17th of 168 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Brunei Darussalam averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brunei Darussalam New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 26,672 USD 36,408 USD 9,736 USD New Zealand
2000s 42,637 USD 44,313 USD 1,676 USD New Zealand
2010s 47,217 USD 49,628 USD 2,412 USD New Zealand
2020s 55,243 USD 51,009 USD 4,234 USD Brunei Darussalam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Brunei Darussalam or New Zealand?
Brunei Darussalam, at 58,062 USD against 56,538 USD in New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Brunei Darussalam and New Zealand?
1,524 USD, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and New Zealand?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Brunei Darussalam and New Zealand rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Brunei Darussalam ranks 15th and New Zealand ranks 17th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brunei Darussalam vs New Zealand: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/brunei-darussalam-2/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/brunei-darussalam-2/new-zealand/">Brunei Darussalam vs New Zealand: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.