Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Comoros: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Bosnia and Herzegovina
4,924 USD
in 2024
Comoros
5,221 USD
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
95th
Comoros rank
94th

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Comoros
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199120072024

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 5,221 USD against 4,924 USD in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 297 USD.

That makes Comoros's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Comoros ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 95th and Comoros ranks 94th of 168 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Comoros in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Comoros Difference Ahead
1990s 2,474 USD 3,664 USD 1,190 USD Comoros
2000s 3,343 USD 3,502 USD 159.33 USD Comoros
2010s 4,565 USD 4,009 USD 555.47 USD Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 5,423 USD 4,948 USD 474.86 USD Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Comoros?
Comoros, at 5,221 USD against 4,924 USD in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Comoros?
297 USD, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Comoros?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Comoros rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 95th and Comoros ranks 94th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Comoros: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/bosnia-and-herzegovina/comoros/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/bosnia-and-herzegovina/comoros/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Comoros: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.