Belarus vs South Africa: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Belarus
8,886 USD
in 2024
South Africa
8,731 USD
in 2024
Belarus rank
79th
South Africa rank
80th

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Belarus
  • South Africa
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k12.0k199120072024

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 8,886 USD against 8,731 USD in South Africa, a difference of 155 USD.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was South Africa ahead.

Belarus ranks 79th and South Africa ranks 80th of 168 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 2,488 USD 4,161 USD 1,673 USD South Africa
2000s 3,805 USD 5,951 USD 2,146 USD South Africa
2010s 7,071 USD 9,551 USD 2,481 USD South Africa
2020s 8,137 USD 10,571 USD 2,434 USD South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Belarus or South Africa?
Belarus, at 8,886 USD against 8,731 USD in South Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Belarus and South Africa?
155 USD, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and South Africa?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do Belarus and South Africa rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Belarus ranks 79th and South Africa ranks 80th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs South Africa: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/belarus/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/belarus/south-africa/">Belarus vs South Africa: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.