Belarus vs Sao Tome and Principe: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Belarus
8,886 USD
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
9,103 USD
in 2024
Belarus rank
79th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
77th

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Belarus
  • Sao Tome and Principe
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k12.0k199120072024

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 9,103 USD against 8,886 USD in Belarus, a difference of 217 USD.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 79th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 77th of 168 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 2,488 USD 6,068 USD 3,580 USD Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 3,805 USD 8,098 USD 4,294 USD Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 7,071 USD 11,128 USD 4,058 USD Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 8,137 USD 10,100 USD 1,964 USD Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Belarus or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 9,103 USD against 8,886 USD in Belarus as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Belarus and Sao Tome and Principe?
217 USD, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sao Tome and Principe?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Belarus ranks 79th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 77th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Sao Tome and Principe: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/belarus/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/belarus/sao-tome-and-principe/">Belarus vs Sao Tome and Principe: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.