Belarus vs China, mainland: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Belarus
8,886 USD
in 2024
China, mainland
8,411 USD
in 2024
Belarus rank
79th
China, mainland rank
82nd

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Belarus
  • China, mainland
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199120072024

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 8,886 USD against 8,411 USD in China, mainland, a difference of 475 USD.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times China, mainland's.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 79th and China, mainland ranks 82nd of 168 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus China, mainland Difference Ahead
1990s 2,488 USD 1,282 USD 1,206 USD Belarus
2000s 3,805 USD 1,944 USD 1,861 USD Belarus
2010s 7,071 USD 4,326 USD 2,745 USD Belarus
2020s 8,137 USD 7,442 USD 695.18 USD Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Belarus or China, mainland?
Belarus, at 8,886 USD against 8,411 USD in China, mainland as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Belarus and China, mainland?
475 USD, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and China, mainland?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do Belarus and China, mainland rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Belarus ranks 79th and China, mainland ranks 82nd of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs China, mainland: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/belarus/china-mainland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/belarus/china-mainland/">Belarus vs China, mainland: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.