Barbados vs New Zealand: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Barbados
50,957 USD
in 2024
New Zealand
56,538 USD
in 2024
Barbados rank
19th
New Zealand rank
17th

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Barbados
  • New Zealand
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k60.0k199120072024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 56,538 USD against 50,957 USD in Barbados, a difference of 5,581 USD.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 19th and New Zealand ranks 17th of 168 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 16,891 USD 36,408 USD 19,517 USD New Zealand
2000s 17,390 USD 44,313 USD 26,923 USD New Zealand
2010s 26,344 USD 49,628 USD 23,284 USD New Zealand
2020s 37,981 USD 51,009 USD 13,029 USD New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Barbados or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 56,538 USD against 50,957 USD in Barbados as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Barbados and New Zealand?
5,581 USD, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and New Zealand?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Barbados and New Zealand rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Barbados ranks 19th and New Zealand ranks 17th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs New Zealand: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/barbados/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/barbados/new-zealand/">Barbados vs New Zealand: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.