Bangladesh vs Congo: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time
- Bangladesh
- Congo
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 1,385 USD against 1,297 USD in Congo, a difference of 88 USD.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Congo ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 148th and Congo ranks 151st of 168 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 483.28 USD | 1,162 USD | 678.46 USD | Congo |
| 2000s | 698.17 USD | 1,108 USD | 410.23 USD | Congo |
| 2010s | 1,207 USD | 1,298 USD | 90.82 USD | Congo |
| 2020s | 1,343 USD | 1,311 USD | 32.25 USD | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Bangladesh or Congo?
- Bangladesh, at 1,385 USD against 1,297 USD in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Bangladesh and Congo?
- 88 USD, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Congo?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Congo rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
- Bangladesh ranks 148th and Congo ranks 151st of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.