Australia vs New Caledonia: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)

Australia
140,977 USD
in 2024
New Caledonia
184,056 USD
in 2024
Australia rank
2nd
New Caledonia rank
1st

ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) over time

  • Australia
  • New Caledonia
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k199120072024

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 184,056 USD against 140,977 USD in Australia, a difference of 43,079 USD.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.3 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 2nd and New Caledonia ranks 1st of 168 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and New Caledonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1990s 44,362 USD 18,316 USD 26,046 USD Australia
2000s 64,589 USD 29,638 USD 34,951 USD Australia
2010s 91,735 USD 93,777 USD 2,041 USD New Caledonia
2020s 120,913 USD 160,264 USD 39,351 USD New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$), Australia or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 184,056 USD against 140,977 USD in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$) between Australia and New Caledonia?
43,079 USD, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Caledonia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Caledonia rank globally for ilo - modelled estimates; faostat - value added (2015 us$)?
Australia ranks 2nd and New Caledonia ranks 1st of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs New Caledonia: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/australia/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-modelled-estimates-faostat-value-added-2015-us-agriculture-value-added-per-worker/australia/new-caledonia/">Australia vs New Caledonia: ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - Modelled Estimates; FAOSTAT - Value added (2015 US$) — Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2015 US$) — Value
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
183 places, 6,104 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.