China, Taiwan Province of vs Lithuania: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Share of employment in agriculture in

China, Taiwan Province of
4.5 %
in 2025
Lithuania
4.7 %
in 2025
China, Taiwan Province of rank
124th
Lithuania rank
121st

ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Share of employment in agriculture in over time

  • China, Taiwan Province of
  • Lithuania
510152025199120082025

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 4.7 % against 4.5 % in China, Taiwan Province of, a difference of 0.2 %.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

China, Taiwan Province of ranks 124th and Lithuania ranks 121st of 175 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Taiwan Province of Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 9.13 % 21.78 % 12.64 % Lithuania
2000s 6.57 % 14.69 % 8.12 % Lithuania
2010s 5.15 % 8.22 % 3.07 % Lithuania
2020s 4.73 % 5.18 % 0.45 % Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — share of employment in agriculture in, China, Taiwan Province of or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 4.7 % against 4.5 % in China, Taiwan Province of as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — share of employment in agriculture in between China, Taiwan Province of and Lithuania?
0.2 %, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Taiwan Province of and Lithuania?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do China, Taiwan Province of and Lithuania rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — share of employment in agriculture in?
China, Taiwan Province of ranks 124th and Lithuania ranks 121st of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Share of employment in agriculture in total employment - ILO Modelled Estimates — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Taiwan Province of vs Lithuania: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Share of employment in agriculture in. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-share-of-employment-in-agriculture-in-total-employment-ilo/china-taiwan-province-of/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-share-of-employment-in-agriculture-in-total-employment-ilo/china-taiwan-province-of/lithuania/">China, Taiwan Province of vs Lithuania: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Share of employment in agriculture in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Share of employment in agriculture in total employment - ILO Modelled Estimates — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
226 places, 7,893 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.