Switzerland vs Uruguay: ILO … Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO modelled estimates Value

Switzerland
108.64 1000 No
in 2025
Uruguay
134.81 1000 No
in 2025
Switzerland rank
137th
Uruguay rank
134th

ILO … Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO modelled estimates Value over time

  • Switzerland
  • Uruguay
050100150200199120082025

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 134.81 1000 No against 108.64 1000 No in Switzerland, a difference of 26.17 1000 No.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times Switzerland's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Switzerland ahead.

Switzerland ranks 137th and Uruguay ranks 134th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Switzerland averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Switzerland Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 175.95 1000 No 152.27 1000 No 23.68 1000 No Switzerland
2000s 160.75 1000 No 158.97 1000 No 1.78 1000 No Switzerland
2010s 149.36 1000 No 157.08 1000 No 7.73 1000 No Uruguay
2020s 111.05 1000 No 137.76 1000 No 26.71 1000 No Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, Switzerland or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 134.81 1000 No against 108.64 1000 No in Switzerland as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between Switzerland and Uruguay?
26.17 1000 No, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Switzerland and Uruguay?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Switzerland and Uruguay rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
Switzerland ranks 137th and Uruguay ranks 134th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Switzerland vs Uruguay: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value/switzerland/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value/switzerland/uruguay/">Switzerland vs Uruguay: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.