South Africa vs Tajikistan: ILO … Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO modelled estimates Value

South Africa
977.23 1000 No
in 2025
Tajikistan
1,066 1000 No
in 2025
South Africa rank
75th
Tajikistan rank
74th

ILO … Estimates Employment in agriculture ILO modelled estimates Value over time

  • South Africa
  • Tajikistan
05001.0k1.5k199120082025

How they compare

Tajikistan currently reports 1,066 1000 No against 977.23 1000 No in South Africa, a difference of 88.77 1000 No.

That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was South Africa ahead.

South Africa ranks 75th and Tajikistan ranks 74th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Tajikistan Difference Ahead
1990s 1,150 1000 No 993.73 1000 No 156.32 1000 No South Africa
2000s 1,026 1000 No 1,128 1000 No 101.73 1000 No Tajikistan
2010s 806.1 1000 No 982.56 1000 No 176.46 1000 No Tajikistan
2020s 927.26 1000 No 1,037 1000 No 109.28 1000 No Tajikistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo, South Africa or Tajikistan?
Tajikistan, at 1,066 1000 No against 977.23 1000 No in South Africa as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo between South Africa and Tajikistan?
88.77 1000 No, with Tajikistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Tajikistan?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do South Africa and Tajikistan rank globally for ilo - ilo modelled estimates — employment in agriculture - ilo?
South Africa ranks 75th and Tajikistan ranks 74th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Tajikistan: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value/south-africa/tajikistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/ilo-ilo-modelled-estimates-employment-in-agriculture-ilo-modelled-estimates-value/south-africa/tajikistan/">South Africa vs Tajikistan: ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILO - ILO Modelled Estimates — Employment in agriculture - ILO modelled estimates — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
227 places, 7,928 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.